Saturday 19 October 2013

History, Colony, Nation Nationalism: Revisiting Raja Rao and His Kanthapura

        Assignment

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        .
                                   
Name: Maheta Arati R.

Roll No: 3.

Class: M.A.-1

Semester -1.



Paper: 4 (Indian Writing in English).
Topic: History, Colony, nation& Nationalism: Revisiting RajaRao&his Kanthapura.   
Submitted to: Respected ME’M-Heenaba Zala.   & Department Of English (MKBU)


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
Raja Rao
Writer
 Raja Rao was an Indian writer of English language novels and short stories, whose works are deeply rooted in Hinduism. Wikipedia
 BornNovember 8, 1908, Hassan, Karnataka
EducationUniversity, University
AwardsPadma Vibhushan, Nested International Prize for Literature


History:  A history is an account of events that have happened in the past.
Colony: A colony is a country which is controlled by a more powerful country.
NationA nation is an individual country considered together with its social and political structures.
Nationalism: Nationalisam is the desire for political independence of people who feel they are historically or culturally a separate group within country.                       

      ‘Indian nationalism is a somewhat misleading shorthand phrase to describe a remarkable era of intellectual and cultural ferment and experimentation inaugurated in the late19th century.

The beginning of the 1930s mark an important benchmark as far as Indian Nationalism is concerned because Indian National Congress ,under the stewardship of Gandhi, emerged as a true ,national ,pan-Indian body, encompassing in its fold all the  cross-sections of the society that  were hitherto denied an entry into the mainstream politics. The Indian National Congress had forged to a considerable extent, a sense of Indianness across the vast stretch of the land, unifying and preparing the people to accept the transition from regional to national in their approach and attitude. This resulted in the emergence of national imaginings of identity. Thus it became a period that witnessed a national urgency to foreground the idea of a unified nation as it was at the core of the decolonization project India  had taken up. And incidentally, Indian English novel too emerged as a major voice to reckon with during the same time. As Meenakshi Mukhrjee notes, it was not a coincidence that Indian English fiction emerged in India in the 1930s, the decade prior to independence, when there was an urgency to foreground the idea of a composite nation.

Nationalism is indeed; on of the forces that shapes the cultural identity of a people. Congress and its leaders a smooth shift in the understanding of identity from religion to nationalism is ensured in a natural way, as the concept of nation and competing version of nationalism become the defining factors of the period. But Nationalism predominantly meant two things 1)It meant the armed resistance to the Imperial Government.2)It also meant the psychological and cultural resistance to the idea of colonialism. In significant manner this resulted in the emergence of a unified nationalist identity; hence the novels written during the period deal with this idea of ‘one nation’ and one identity.

Commenting upon the necessity of constructing such a pan- Indian identity, Meenakshi Mukhrjee write in her Anxiety of Indianness  that “any project of constructing a national identity is predicted upon two simultaneous  imperatives;1)an erasure of differences  within the border,2)  and accentuating the difference with what  lies outside”. As a language ,English in India achieves  the first goal of erasing  the internal  difference, which constitute regional identities  within India.When it comes to Indian nationalisam,  therefore non other than a personality like Gandhi takes up this task of unifying Indian diversities on the one hand ,and positing unified Indian tradition in an oppositional relation to the Modern Civilisation , which  the west symbolises .This is precisely the socio-literary interregnum where the anxiety of Indian English Literature becomes visibly manifest:Indian  English Literature has  to perform  on the one hand, the task of erasing the minor constituents of identity and on the other,also stress over the importence of a pan –Indian identity.In the Indian context , during the national imagining of identity  Gandhi forms the locus of identity because he stands for a pan –Indian symbol of india’S  peacekeeping and non-violent heritage: the whole of India ,with its thousand of years of tradition,comes to identity itself with this frad figure. By adhering to the western realistic mode of biographical sketch , Indian EnglishLiterature can at best capture the political face of Gandhi but not the extent to which Gandhi occupie;the mass  consciousness of India.Gandhi for the Indian masses is not merely  a political leader ;he is their saviour ,a legend ,who they believe is divinely ordained to release India from the  bondage of west . And in order to bring out all these dimensions of Gandhi.A writer has to be electic in his sources choocing  from history,fable,tradition  etc.Therefore the Indian English writer resorts  to mixing fact and fiction,myth and reality.This is were we can locate the significance of Raja Rao who combines in his writings  traditional techniques of narrating history  with the contemporary history such a technique speaks volumes for  the successful combination of the historigraphic practices of the West with the autochthonous narrative traditions of India.This thesis  begins precisely from this point of historical that connect s Indian writers in English to the ancient literary traditions of India  as well as to the more contemporary and  cosmopolitan tradition of west.

Between these two pulls Raja Rao finds a plausible answer by surrendering  to what might be called  a ‘Literary middle path’.Successfully adhering and emulating the tradition of creative narrativisation of the past,he brings the historical  insightedness of the Western  historiography into the creative and Literary folders of  Indian tradition; this RajaRao does  by Infusing  within English ,the Indian sensibility and Indian vision to form Indian identity.In his much cited article “The Meaning of India”Raja Rao unambiguously defines India and Indian identity.

In this novel the novelist attempting to define India,not through the geographical and tropical landmark that are in India; not through its flora and fauna ,not also through the kings who ruled in India. While it is true that all these are truly Indian. they become Indian because they essentially share the vision called India. They are the manifestation of a Darshan called India. In order to define the history of such an abstract concept Raja Rao invariably makes use of all the modes of recording the past  whether it is a myth, a legend, a story, a narration…he mixes all these forms to portray the present  history of his time. His works demonstrate how even a contemporary political event such as Indian Freedom struggle

Raja Rao’s Kanthapura enacts some of the motifs of post colonialism. In my previous post here I point out that Raja Rao critiques the simple position that the discourse of colonialism instituted a notion of the natural superiority of the colonizing race and this was internalized by the colonized. In the second piece on the novel I point to how the novel problematizes viewing colonial modernity as having had a liberating impact on the Indian society. Let me take this reading further. When Rao turns even Gandhi into myth, a major deviation is introduced within the structure of the novel. It is worth nothing how he describes Gandhi in his short story “Narsiga”. Who was this Gandhiji Narsa had asked “an old man-a bewitching man, a saint you know!...he looks beautiful  as morning sun and he wears only a little loincloth like a pariah…he is a great man. They say he is an incarnation of God and that is why everybody touches his feet, even Brahmins, In the story  the  boy sees Gandhi as Rama and Red ruler as a Ravana-the monster for whose extermination  Lord Vishnu had to reincarnate as Rama .When Gandhi is released from the prison ,he likens the event to rama’s return from exile; The Mahatma is going to fly in the air like goddess Sita and in a flower chariot drawn by 16 steeds…they will fly through air and the heavens will let fall a rain of flowers. This is how the Indian sensibility affects the way one looks at things, In the naïve observation of a boy pure contemporary political event is absorbed into the mythic tradition of the land ,a political movement such as Indian nationalism assumes a religious significance in the observation of the boy, thus signaling a new note in understanding an ideology called  Nationalism from  an Indian  perspective.

The novel highlights with no subtlety the collusion between colonialism and Brahmanism. The manner in which Moorthy becomes an outcaste in the Brahmin quarters with his campaign against untouchability indicates the tension between Brahmanism and nationalism. For Brahmanism, the colonial ruler is not the enemy but Gandhi’s anti-untouchable movement is. The collusion between Brahmanism and colonialism is suggested through the alliance between Bhatta, Bade Khan the policeman and the Sahib of the Estate. Swami, who is waging a war against ‘caste pollution due to this pariah business, sees British rulers as protectors of the ancient ways of Dharma. Swami receives a large amount from the govt as Rajadakshina and is promised that he would receive moral and material support in his war the novel highlights with no subtlety the collusion between colonialism and Brahmanism. The manner in which Moorthy becomes an outcaste in the Brahmin quarters with his campaign against untouchability indicates the tension between Brahmanism and nationalism. For Brahmanism, the colonial ruler is not the enemy but Gandhi’s anti-untouchable movement is. The collusion between Brahmanism and colonialism is suggested through the alliance between Bhatta, Bade Khan the policeman and the Sahib of the Estate. Swami, who is waging a war against ‘caste pollution due to this pariah business, sees British rulers as protectors of the ancient ways of Dharma. Swami receives a large amount from the govt as Rajadakshina and is promised that he would receive moral and material support in his war against caste pollution. Gainst caste pollution.
Raja Rao’s’ Kanthapura ‘is best cited to illustrate this purpose. The novel records Gandhi’s mass movement during the freedom struggle aimed solely at arousing a nationalistic consciousness which would help in forming up a unique national identity constructed by uniting the masses. Achieving this is not an easy task considering the diversity in religion, caste, creed, etc. of the nation. In order to bring together those diverse sects under a common roof, Gandhi feels the need for secularism and religious tolerance. He professes his secular notion of religion and incites to the mind of the masses, the oneness of men, negating any sectarian religion and caste and class based divisions. As he observes:

Man’s ultimate aim is the realization of God, and all his activities, political, social 
and religious, have to be guided by the ultimate aim of the vision of God. The 
immediate service of all human beings becomes a necessary part of the endeavor 
simply because the only way to find God is to see Him in His creation and be one 
with it. This can be done by service of all. And this cannot be done except through 
one’s country. (Chakrabarti 35)

This aspect of the Gandhi an thought had an impact on the creative impetus of the Indian novelists in English.
In this paper I will discuss on how Gandhian blending of politics and religion gives an impact on the minds of the Indian masses, especially of the villagers. Taking instances from Raja Rao’s novel Kanthapura, I will seek to show how Gandhian political thoughts and teachings come in the guise of traditional religious terms and how it stirs the innocent and superstitious imaginations of the village folk. Gandhian secularism and spiritual teachings aim to dismantle the rigid social caste based structure, thereby enabling the masses to unite under a common religion, the religion of Truth and Love. The social and political programs of Gandhi converge with the religious aspect of his thought thereby making them appealing to the religious and superstitious Indian masses.

The writer records Gandhian impact on typical Indian village through an informal but very intimate narration of an elderly widow, Acchakka.Gandhi is again portrayed here as Rama, Krishna and Shiva whose birth has a divine significance. As the novel says, once Valmiki the great sage and the writer ofRamayana,in the novel they goes to the lord Brahma and says,

‘O Brahma you who have sent us the Prince …………..incarnate on the Earth and free my beloved daughter  from her enforced slavery.(p.15).

In what appears to be an interpolation into the religious tradition of India, the novel treats Gandhi as a divine reincarnation of Shiva, whose birth in Gujarat is meant just to kill the Red man and free Mother India from the clutches of oppression. The colonial    intrusion as halen Tiffin notes is seen in the novel ‘s oral structure as one story of the vanquishing of a demon by goddess within the framework of timeless comparable legends and Gandhi is portrayed as one such avatar, a reincarnation, who is born to save India from the bondage and tyranny of Ravana –the Red ruler.   The entire novel speaks volumes for how a creative  writer assimilates and transcends a contemporary  political reality   into the cultural consciousness  of a tradition race and people.Alessandro monti observes in this context.                                      

In Kanthapura, religion an integral part of culture    has been used for a secular and political purpose such as attaining Independence.  Here religion has got a very significant role to play in defining the identity of people and also of the nation. but its scope has been limited and meaning restricted only towards meeting a secular and political end-achieving Independence. Raja Rao exquisitely appropriates the Indian  religious tradition of Harikatha   to promote the cause of  nation and also to accord this cause a sacred dimension. In fact the novel makes use of two kinds of appropriates 1) it appropriates the religious tradition    of the country,  such as Harikatha  to further the contemporary issues  such as Swaraj and Nation,2)    it also appropriates    the contemporary history such as Indian National Movement and brings it to the fold of the religious tradition of India. Jay ram char’s Harikatha on the birth of Gandhi Mahatma.
In this novel he talks about the four part of society .the novel dormant pattern to the treatment of cast and communities of Kanthapura, a tiny village represent of any other village of South India. In the beginning of the novel we encounter the whole village stratified and hierarchised on the basis of caste, creed and religion .There is a Brahmin street, Pariah quarter, Weavers colony, Potter’s community etc.    The use of the religious metaphor helps

Raja Rao’s narrator to explain the subtleties of freedom movement. It is a part of Raja Rao’snarrative technique. The narrator blends the past with the present. Myths coexist with contemporary reality. The strength to fight the British comes from the religious faith. For the illiterate villagers, the contemporary problems like those of the freedom struggle can be explained through scriptures which form the psyche of the Indians. The appeal of these religious books has the efficacy to inspire the simple villagers to join the Satyagrahis. The villagers, now and then, invoke the spirit of goddess Kenchammafor for the success of the freedom movement. Ram festivals, Krishna festivals, Gandhi Festivals with all religious fervor, the Bhajans and Hari-Kathabecome popular and sustain the spirit of theKanthapurians. They ascribe the success of the movement to the blessings of these deities. Temples are used to recruit members for the Congress, and they administer the oath of allegiance to the party and its ideologies, particularly, of Ahimsa, Love and Truth in the sanctum sanctorum Gandhi is a vast symbol of ideal life-code, of a holy and noble person. Achakka, the narrator is like Shelley’s West wind, a symbol of rebirth and regeneration. Moorthy becomes a symbol of a modern progressive and spiritual leader. At time she is a Bhakt Prahalad, a messiah of the pariah, a symbol of new life in Kanthapura. if and that is Love of mankind, and there is one God in life and that is God of all. Moorthy says that he is just “a pebble among pebbles of the river, and when the floods come, rocked by rock may be buried. This statement suggests his victory over egoism. His recitation of “Shivoham, Shivoham” is purely Vedantic.    

The total destruction of Kanthapura towards the end of the novel is symbolic of new life emerging out of the dead one. Just as a new Phoenix arises out of holy ashes of the burnt one, Kashipura becomes new one. It is a purgatorial process that gives a new life. Rajesh K. Pall an summarizes the entire process: ...The end of novel is like the end of Kalyuga with the Parlays or inundation engulfing the whole village. All the villagers leave Kanthapura to settle in Kashipura. Range Gowda, the one-time head of the village, goes to Kanthapura only to find,’ there is neither man nor mosquito in Kanthapura.’This is undoubtedly a change from yuga cradling into another, and parlays indicates the end of cyclical civilization and the preparation for the new beginning and the trumpet call of change; is head by RangeGowda in the end of the novel whose hear ‘beat’ like a  drum.’Kanthapura is an epic of freedom struggle, encompassing India’s vastness within its artistic battles fought on the field of the villages. The role of the villages in freedom struggle has not, hitherto, been adequately appreciated by historians. It is a marvel of narrative technique, a blend of puranicstyle, symbols, myths, religious metaphor and linguistic experiments.

In this novel Raja Rao also talks about the freedom struggle experiments.. Raja Rao is one of the most widely acclaimed Indian English novelists whose fame rest son wide range of his intellectual, spiritual, national, political & social thought content. Kanthapura (1938) which depicts the mirror images of contemporary Indian society emerges as an ancient classic narrates all affairs of social milieu; through the picture of small village Kanthapura Rao reveals his intense He strongly displays deep & firmly roofed passion nationalistic zeal and spiritual concerns begin with his first novel Kanthapura. It is believed as an epic and the creative construction of a work of fiction through nationalism and spirituality. Meenakshi Mukhrjee expresses her views in this regard as: Kanthapura is narrated by an old woman to a hypothetical listener....Raja Rao’s choice of this narrator serves several purposes at once. Making this old woman the narrator enables Raja Rao to mingle facts and myths and in an effective manner. For the old woman, Jawaharlal is a Bharata’s to the Mahatma who she believes will slay Ravana so that Sita may be freed. For her Gandhi has attained the status of God and Moorthy is regarded Avatar in Kanthapura. The characteristically concrete imagination of the uneducated mind pictures the Mahatma as large and blue like the Sahyadn Mountain on whose slopes the pilgrims climb to the top, while Moorthy is seen as a small mountain. Toner the Satyagraha becomes a religious ceremony to which she devotes her sacred ardour.It is known fact that the Indian freedom movement gained true pace under the able leadership of Mahatma Gandhi since 1920s which made powerful impact on Indian life and sensibility and is even marked in the novel where Rao attunes himself with his philosophical concern for Gandhian thoughts of non-violence, untouchability, truth and shows fascination for Vedanta’T he fact is that very concept of nationalism means alien to India before the 19th Century as a reaction to the British colonial rule in India. Alan’s Kohn in Nationalism: Its meaning & History Comments: Nationalism in India is not as a vehicle of individual liberty but as adoration of collective power. (Kohn, 2 Rao brings out the fact about Gandhi’s belief that politics and religion are inextricably mated together; Kanthapura evinces this divine truth that man’s status in the society is spiritual as much as it is political. Kanthapura emerges to be a laboratory of the Gandhian thought and theory. Raja Rao’sacute awareness of the spiritual ideals and values of ancient India and its place and impact on the  emotional make-up of the inhabitants of this South Indian Village during the period when Gandhi’s personality and thought was a force to be reckoned with. Iyengar aptly comments that he novel is a veritable grammar of the Gandhian myth. (Iyanger,87) Religious fervor in Kanthapura is blended with social realism in such a way that the ideas of Gandhiji are easily comprehended by the villagers. The impact of Harikatha is ennobling and innovating and even the old women cannot remain detached. Gandhiji had been a divine man and a saint. Kanthapura, the little village, forms the microcosm of the Indian subcontinent is shown to come to life where movement for national freedom during twenties and thirties worked on successfully. The village is located in the province of Kara, situated high on the Ghats and the steep mountains facing the Arabian sea Like Kanthapura, thousands of villages of India had woken up to fight the alien rulers.


The remote village is caught in the maelstrom of the freedom struggle of the 1930s and is transformed into living symbol of Gandhism. R.S. Singh’s observation is noteworthy in this regard of nationalism and spirituality: It may be clarified at outset that Kanthapura, is not an allegory because the comparison between Gandhi-British rule and Rama-Ravana situation is not elaborate and complete. It is only a convenient comparison. A villager born and brought up in Indian Tradition understands easily a contemporary problem if it is explained through fable or an episode of the Ramayana or the Mahabharata or the Gita etc.Moreover, the narrator, being an old woman found it easier to explain subtle thoughts of Man

3 comments: